“The general referral rate in our 2018 general election was 0.0027%,” Griswold said. Any accusations of fraud get referred to the Colorado Attorney General’s office. To do this, Colorado uses bipartisan teams who compare the signature on every ballot to ones the state has on file for every registered voter. If there’s a mismatch, they alert the voter. Signature curing means verifying if a signature is valid. “The percentage of folks who have to ‘cure’ is higher for younger people because they don’t have as many signatures in our system,” Griswold said. More: Voting by mail is popular in Florida, despite President Trump's criticisms Or it could be a natural variation in the way someone signs his or her name. Griswold said someone’s signature can change due to a health event or an ongoing medical condition. Her state has voted almost entirely by mail since 2014. There are lots of reasons - that aren’t fraud - for a signature mismatch, Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold said. Election workers rejected the remaining 2,300 for other concerns, including signatures on the ballots not matching the ones on file. Of those, 800 ballots were improperly bundled.
The Passaic County Board of Elections tossed out 3,190 mail-in ballots, or about 19% of those submitted, according to. Judicial Watch stated “nearly 20% of the 16,000 ballots were disqualified." That claim is correct however, it needs context. “We are not releasing any additional information at this time, beyond what is in the press release and complaints,” spokesman Peter Aseltine wrote in an email. When asked about Javier's claim to the television station, the attorney general’s office declined to comment. The Real Clear Politics report notes a woman named Ramona Javier told NBC 4 New York that she never received a ballot despite being listed as having voted. “This is corruption,” Javier said. Judicial Watch points to two articles to describe the situation, one from Real Clear Politics and another from. Nowhere in any of the charging documents or public statements made by officials in New Jersey does it allege that any of the four men voted on someone else’s behalf. More: Fact check: Mailing ballots to dead people not leading to voter fraud, experts and studies say New Jersey also alleged that Jackson received one ballot that wasn’t sealed, and that ballot was subsequently delivered to the board of elections in a sealed envelope without information identifying the bearer.
#New jersey fake check laws registration#
Mendez also was accused of submitting one or more voter registration applications where he allegedly knew the person was not eligible to vote in the district. On June 25, state Attorney General Gurbir Grewal charged Paterson City Councilman Michael Jackson, Councilman-Elect Alex Mendez, Shelim Khalique and Abu Razyen with the crimes, saying they collected and delivered more than three ballots each and did not identify themselves as the “bearer.” More: New Jersey election will be held mostly by mail in November, governor says They cannot collect and deliver more than three ballots, and they cannot be a candidate in the election, according to New Jersey election law. Voters can put it in the mail themselves, deliver it to the local board of elections or designate a “bearer” to drop off their ballot. “Bearers” must identify themselves on the ballot. The Judicial Watch article alleges this is what happened: “The scheme appears to have been simple: the men collected blank ballots, forged the paperwork and signatures, and submitted fake votes.”įirst, a bit of background on the state's election law: New Jersey has three ways to legally submit a mail-in ballot. The election was the first there conducted completely by mail, due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Postal Inspection Service reported finding hundreds of ballots in a single mailbox during a May election for the city of Paterson. More: 'He's scaring our own voters': Republicans run into a Donald Trump problem as they push mail voting What happened in Jerseyįour men from New Jersey were charged with multiple counts of voting fraud after the U.S.
Judicial Watch is a "conservative, nonpartisan educational foundation, according to its website, and states its purpose as promoting "transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law,"Īn email request for comment from the post’s author was not returned. Watch Video: Elections 2020: Mail-in voting could decide next president The claim: Mail-in ballot fraud in New Jersey is a sign of bigger issues.Īn article, "Mail-In Ballot Fraud in New Jersey Signals National Trouble" published July 15 on the website run by Judicial Watch, uses the arrest of four men in New Jersey on voter fraud allegations as evidence for “national trouble” if more American states move to vote-by-mail systems ahead of the 2020 election.
0 kommentar(er)
